ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Revolutionary Guide To Exam PECB Dumps
ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Free Study Guide! with New Update 418 Exam Questions
PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor certification is recognized globally and is highly valued by employers. PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam certification demonstrates that an individual has the necessary skills and knowledge to effectively audit an organization's ISMS and ensure that it is compliant with the ISO/IEC 27001 standard. PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam certification is particularly valuable for professionals who work in the field of information security management, such as IT managers, security consultants, and auditors.
To be eligible to take the PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Certification Exam, candidates must have at least five years of professional experience in information security, with two years of experience in ISMS auditing. They must also have completed a PECB-certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor training course or an equivalent. ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor exam consists of two parts: a written exam and a practical exam. The written exam is a four-hour closed-book exam, while the practical exam is a two-hour role-play exercise that simulates an actual audit.
NEW QUESTION # 217
You are performing an ISMS audit at a residential nursing home that provides healthcare services.
The next step in your audit plan is to verify the information security incident management process.
The IT Security Manager presents the information security incident management procedure (Document reference ID:ISMS_L2_16, version 4).
You review the document and notice a statement "Any information security weakness, event, and incident should be reported to the Point of Contact (PoC) within 1 hour after identification". When interviewing staff, you found that there were differences in the understanding of the meaning of the phrase "weakness, event, and incident".
The IT Security Manager explained that an online "information security handling" training seminar was conducted 6 months ago. All the people interviewed participated in and passed the reporting exercise and course assessment.
You would like to investigate other areas further to collect more audit evidence. Select three options that would not be valid audit trails.
- A. Collect more evidence on how information security incidents are reported via appropriate channels (relevant to control A.6.8)
- B. Collect more evidence on whether terms and definitions are contained in the information security policy. (Relevant to control 5.32)
- C. Collect more evidence on how the organisation learns from information security incidents and makes improvements. (Relevant to control A.5.27)
- D. Collect more evidence on how the organisation manages the Point of Contact (PoC) which monitors vulnerabilities. (Relevant to clause 8.1)
- E. Collect more evidence to determine if ISO 27035 (Information security incident management) is used as internal audit criteria. (Relevant to clause 8.13)
- F. Collect more evidence on how the organisation conducts information security incident training and evaluates its effectiveness. (Relevant to clause 7.2)
- G. Collect more evidence on how areas subject to information security incidents are quarantined to maintain information security during disruption (relevant to control A.5.29)
- H. Collect more evidence on how the organisation tests the business continuity plan. (Relevant to control A.5.30)
Answer: B,D,E
Explanation:
The three options that would not be valid audit trails are:
*Collect more evidence on how the organisation manages the Point of Contact (PoC) which monitors vulnerabilities. (Relevant to clause 8.1)
*Collect more evidence on whether terms and definitions are contained in the information security policy.
(Relevant to control 5.32)
*Collect more evidence to determine if ISO 27035 (Information security incident management) is used as internal audit criteria. (Relevant to clause 8.13) These options are not valid audit trails because they are not directly related to the information security incident management process, which is the focus of the audit. The audit trails should be relevant to the objectives, scope, and criteria of the audit, and should provide sufficient and reliable evidence to support the audit findings and conclusions1.
Option E is not valid because the PoC is not a part of the information security incident management process, but rather a role that is responsible for reporting and escalating information security incidents to the appropriate authorities2. The audit trail should focus on how the PoC performs this function, not how the organisation manages the PoC.
Option G is not valid because the terms and definitions are not a part of the information security incident management process, but rather a part of the information security policy, which is a high-level document that defines the organisation's information security objectives, principles, and responsibilities3. The audit trail should focus on how the information security policy is communicated, implemented, and reviewed, not whether it contains terms and definitions.
Option H is not valid because ISO 27035 is not a part of the information security incident management process, but rather a guidance document that provides best practices for managing information security incidents4. The audit trail should focus on how the organisation follows the requirements of ISO/IEC 27001:
2022 for information security incident management, not whether it uses ISO 27035 as an internal audit criteria.
The other options are valid audit trails because they are related to the information security incident management process, and they can provide useful evidence to evaluate the conformity and effectiveness of the process. For example:
*Option A is valid because it relates to control A.5.29, which requires the organisation to establish procedures to isolate and quarantine areas subject to information security incidents, in order to prevent further damage and preserve evidence5. The audit trail should collect evidence on how the organisation implements and tests these procedures, and how they ensure the continuity of information security during disruption.
*Option B is valid because it relates to control A.6.8, which requires the organisation to establish mechanisms for reporting information security events and weaknesses, and to ensure that they are communicated in a timely manner to the appropriate levels within the organisation6. The audit trail should collect evidence on how the organisation defines and uses these mechanisms, and how they monitor and review the reporting process.
*Option C is valid because it relates to clause 7.2, which requires the organisation to provide information security awareness, education, and training to all persons under its control, and to evaluate the effectiveness of these activities7. The audit trail should collect evidence on how the organisation identifies the information security training needs, how they deliver and record the training, and how they measure the learning outcomes and feedback.
*Option D is valid because it relates to control A.5.27, which requires the organisation to learn from information security incidents and to implement corrective actions to prevent recurrence or reduce impact8.
The audit trail should collect evidence on how the organisation analyses and documents the root causes and consequences of information security incidents, how they identify and implement corrective actions, and how they verify the effectiveness of these actions.
*Option F is valid because it relates to control A.5.30, which requires the organisation to establish and maintain a business continuity plan to ensure the availability of information and information processing facilities in the event of a severe information security incident9. The audit trail should collect evidence on how the organisation develops and updates the business continuity plan, how they test and review the plan, and how they communicate and train the relevant personnel on the plan.
References:
1: ISO 19011:2018, 6.2;
2: ISO/IEC 27001:2022, A.6.8.1;
3: ISO/IEC 27001:2022, 5.2;
4: ISO/IEC 27035:2016, Introduction;
5: ISO/IEC 27001:2022, A.5.29;
6: ISO/IEC 27001:2022, A.6.8;
7: ISO/IEC 27001:2022, 7.2;
8: ISO/IEC 27001:2022, A.5.27;
9: ISO/IEC 27001:2022, A.5.30;
10: ISO 19011:2018;
11: ISO/IEC 27001:2022;
12: ISO/IEC 27001:2022;
13: ISO/IEC 27035:2016;
14: ISO/IEC 27001:2022;
15: ISO/IEC 27001:2022;
16: ISO/IEC 27001:2022;
17: ISO/IEC 27001:2022;
18: ISO/IEC 27001:2022
NEW QUESTION # 218
The following are purposes of Information Security, except:
- A. Ensure Business Continuity
- B. Minimize Business Risk
- C. Maximize Return on Investment
- D. Increase Business Assets
Answer: D
Explanation:
The following are purposes of information security, except increasing business assets. Increasing business assets is not a purpose of information security, as it is not directly related to protecting information and systems from threats and risks. Information security may contribute to increasing business assets by enhancing customer trust, reputation, compliance, and efficiency, but it is not its primary goal. Ensuring business continuity is a purpose of information security, as it aims to prevent or minimize disruptions or losses caused by incidents affecting information and systems. Minimizing business risk is a purpose of information security, as it aims to identify and reduce threats and vulnerabilities that may compromise information and systems.
Maximizing return on investment is a purpose of information security, as it aims to optimize the costs and benefits of implementing and maintaining information security controls and measures. References: : CQI & IRCA ISO 27001:2022 Lead Auditor Course Handbook, page 23. : [ISO/IEC 27001 Brochures | PECB], page
4.
NEW QUESTION # 219
Scenario 8: EsBank provides banking and financial solutions to the Estonian banking sector since September
2010. The company has a network of 30 branches with over 100 ATMs across the country.
Operating in a highly regulated industry, EsBank must comply with many laws and regulations regarding the security and privacy of data. They need to manage information security across their operations by implementing technical and nontechnical controls. EsBank decided to implement an ISMS based on ISO/IEC
27001 because it provided better security, more risk control, and compliance with key requirements of laws and regulations.
Nine months after the successful implementation of the ISMS, EsBank decided to pursue certification of their ISMS by an independent certification body against ISO/IEC 27001 .The certification audit included all of EsBank's systems, processes, and technologies.
The stage 1 and stage 2 audits were conducted jointly and several nonconformities were detected. The first nonconformity was related to EsBank's labeling of information. The company had an information classification scheme but there was no information labeling procedure. As a result, documents requiring the same level of protection would be labeled differently (sometimes as confidential, other times sensitive).
Considering that all the documents were also stored electronically, the nonconformity also impacted media handling. The audit team used sampling and concluded that 50 of 200 removable media stored sensitive information mistakenly classified as confidential. According to the information classification scheme, confidential information is allowed to be stored in removable media, whereas storing sensitive information is strictly prohibited. This marked the other nonconformity.
They drafted the nonconformity report and discussed the audit conclusions with EsBank's representatives, who agreed to submit an action plan for the detected nonconformities within two months.
EsBank accepted the audit team leader's proposed solution. They resolved the nonconformities by drafting a procedure for information labeling based on the classification scheme for both physical and electronic formats. The removable media procedure was also updated based on this procedure.
Two weeks after the audit completion, EsBank submitted a general action plan. There, they addressed the detected nonconformities and the corrective actions taken, but did not include any details on systems, controls, or operations impacted. The audit team evaluated the action plan and concluded that it would resolve the nonconformities. Yet, EsBank received an unfavorable recommendation for certification.
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
According to scenario 8, the audit team evaluated the action plan and concluded that it would resolve the detected nonconformities. Is this acceptable?
- A. No, the auditee should verify if the action plan allows the correction of nonconformities and elimination of the root causes
- B. Yes, only if EsBank has previously verified the effectiveness of the action plan and informed the audit team that the action plan allows the correction of nonconformities
- C. Yes. the audit team must evaluate the action plan and verify if it is appropriate for correcting the detected nonconformities
Answer: C
Explanation:
Yes, the audit team must evaluate the action plan and verify if it is appropriate for correcting the detected nonconformities. This is part of the auditor's responsibilities to ensure that the proposed actions adequately address the issues identified during the audit.
NEW QUESTION # 220
As the ISMS audit team leader, you are conducting a second-party audit of an international logistics company on behalf of an online retailer. During the audit, one of your team members reports a nonconformity relating to control 5.18 (Access rights) of Appendix A of ISO/IEC 27001:2022. She found evidence that removing the server access protocols of 20 people who left in the last 3 months took up to 1 week whereas the policy required removing access within 24 hours of their departure.
Complete the sentence with the best word(s), dick on the blank section you want to complete so that it is highlighted in red, and then click on the applicable text from the options below. Alternatively, you may drag and drop the option to the appropriate blank section.
Answer:
Explanation:
Explanation:
The purpose of including access rights in an information management system to ISO/IEC 27001:2022 is to provide, review, modify and remove these permissions in accordance with the organisation's policy and rules for access control.
Access rights are the permissions granted to users or groups of users to access, use, modify, or delete information assets. Access rights should be aligned with the organisation's access control policy, which defines the objectives, principles, roles, and responsibilities for managing access to information systems.
Access rights should also follow the organisation's rules for access control, which specify the criteria, procedures, and controls for granting, reviewing, modifying, and revoking access rights. The purpose of including access rights in an information management system is to ensure that only authorised users can access information assets according to their business needs and roles, and to prevent unauthorised or inappropriate access that could compromise the confidentiality, integrity, or availability of information assets. References:
* ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A Control 5.181
* ISO/IEC 27002:2022 Control 5.182
* CQI & IRCA Certified ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Lead Auditor (Information Security Management Systems) Training Course3
NEW QUESTION # 221
You are an experienced ISMS auditor conducting a third-party surveillance audit at an organisation which offers ICT reclamation services.
ICT equipment which companies no longer require is processed by the organisation. It is either recommissioned and reused or is securely destroyed.
You notice two servers on a bench in the corner of the room. Both have stickers on them with the server's name, IP address and admin password.
You ask the ICT Manager about them, and he tells you they were part of a shipment received yesterday from a regular customer.
Which one action should you take?
- A. Raise a nonconformity against control 5.31 'Legal, staturary, regulatory and contractual requirements'
- B. Note the audit finding and check the process for dealing with incoming shipments relating to customer IT security
- C. Ask the ICT Manager to record an information security incident and initiate the information security incident management process
- D. Raise a nonconformity against control 8.20 'network security' (networks and network devices shall be secured, managed and controlled to protect information in systems and applications)
- E. Ask the auditee to remove the labels, then carry on with the audit
- F. Record what you have seen in your audit findings, but take no further action
Answer: B
NEW QUESTION # 222
You are performing an ISMS audit at a European-based residential
nursing home called ABC that provides healthcare services. You find all nursing home residents wear an electronic wristband for monitoring their location, heartbeat, and blood pressure always. You learned that the electronic wristband automatically uploads all data to the artificial intelligence (AI) cloud server for healthcare monitoring and analysis by healthcare staff.
The next step in your audit plan is to verify that the information security policy and objectives have been established by top management.
During the audit, you found the following audit evidence.
Match the audit evidence to the corresponding requirement in ISO/IEC 27001:2022.
Answer:
Explanation:
NEW QUESTION # 223 
Answer:
Explanation:
Explanation:
An audit finding is the result of the evaluation of the collected audit evidence against audit criteria.
NEW QUESTION # 224
Which two of the following statements are true?
- A. The role of a certification body auditor involves evaluating the organisation's processes for ensuring compliance with their legal requirements
- B. Curing a third-party audit, the auditor evaluates how the organisation ensures that 4 6 made aware of changes to the legal requirements
- C. As part of a certification body audit the auditor is resporable for verifying the organisation's legal compliance status
Answer: A,B
Explanation:
The following statements are true:
* The role of a certification body auditor involves evaluating the organization's processes for ensuring compliance with their legal requirements. This is part of the auditor's responsibility to assess the effectiveness and conformity of the organization's ISMS against the ISO/IEC 27001:2022 standard and the applicable legal and regulatory requirements.
* During a third-party audit, the auditor evaluates how the organization ensures that they are made aware of changes to the legal requirements. This is part of the auditor's responsibility to verify that the organization has established and maintained a process for identifying and updating their legal and other requirements related to information security. The following statement is false:
* As part of a certification body audit, the auditor is responsible for verifying the organization's legal compliance status. This is not true, as the auditor is not authorized or qualified to provide legal advice or judgment on the organization's compliance status. The auditor can only report on the evidence of compliance or noncompliance observed during the audit, but the ultimate responsibility for ensuring legal compliance lies with the organization. References: : CQI & IRCA ISO 27001:2022 Lead Auditor Course Handbook, page 66. : CQI & IRCA ISO 27001:2022 Lead Auditor Course Handbook, page 67.
: ISO/IEC 27001 LEAD AUDITOR - PECB, page 22.
NEW QUESTION # 225
Finnco, a subsidiary of a certification body, provided ISMS consultancy services to an organization.
Considering this scenario, when can the certification body certify the organization?
- A. At no time, since it presents a conflict of interest
- B. There is no time constraint in such a situation
- C. If a minimum period of two years has passed since the last consulting activities
Answer: A
Explanation:
A certification body cannot certify an organization if it has provided consultancy services to that organization.
This situation presents a conflict of interest, as the certification body is required to maintain impartiality and objectivity. The ISO/IEC 17021-1 standard, which sets out requirements for bodies providing audit and certification of management systems, specifies that providing both services to the same client is incompatible.
References: ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Conformity assessment - Requirements for bodies providing audit and certification of management systems
NEW QUESTION # 226
You are an experienced ISMS audit team leader. An auditor in training has approached you to ask you to clarify the different types of audits she may be required to undertake.
Match the following audit types to the descriptions.
To complete the table click on the blank section you want to complete so that It is highlighted In fed, and then click on the applicable text from the options below. Alternatively, you may drag and drop each option to the appropriate blank section.
Answer:
Explanation:
NEW QUESTION # 227
Question:
Which option below is correct about the audit plan?
- A. The auditee's top management prepares the audit plan
- B. The audit plan should be flexible to allow for modifications
- C. The audit plan involves the use of several audit procedures
Answer: B
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:
* B. Correct Answer:
* Audit plans must remain flexible to adapt to unforeseen findings and risks.
* ISO 19011:2018 specifies that audit planning should allow dynamic adjustments.
* A. Incorrect:
* Audit procedures are part of execution, not planning.
* C. Incorrect:
* The audit team, not top management, prepares the audit plan.
Relevant Standard Reference:
* ISO 19011:2018 Clause 5.4 (Audit Planning Flexibility)
NEW QUESTION # 228
You are performing an ISMS audit at a residential nursing home that provides healthcare services. The next step in your audit plan is to verify the information security incident management process. The IT Security Manager presents the information security incident management procedure and explains that the process is based on ISO/IEC 27035-1:2016.
You review the document and notice a statement "any information security weakness, event, and incident should be reported to the Point of Contact (PoC) within 1 hour after identification". When interviewing staff, you found that there were differences in the understanding of the meaning of "weakness, event, and incident".
You sample incident report records from the event tracking system for the last 6 months with summarized results in the following table.
You would like to further investigate other areas to collect more audit evidence. Select two options that will not be in your audit trail.
- A. Collect more evidence on how the organization determined no further action was needed after the incident. (Relevant to control A.5.26)
- B. Collect more evidence by interviewing more staff about their understanding of the reporting process.
(Relevant to control A.6.8) - C. Collect more evidence on how the organisation determined the incident recovery time. (Relevant to control A.5.27)
- D. Collect more evidence on how and when the company pays the ransom fee to unlock the company's mobile phone and data, i.e., credit card, and bank transfer. (Relevant to control A.5.26)
- E. Collect more evidence on the incident recovery procedures. (Relevant to control A.5.26)
- F. Collect more evidence on how and when the Human Resources manager pays the ransom fee to unlock personal mobile data, i.e., credit card, and bank transfer. (Relevant to control A.5.26)
- G. Collect more evidence on what the service requirements of healthcare monitoring are. (Relevant to clause 4.2)
Answer: D,G
Explanation:
According to ISO/IEC 27001:2022, which specifies the requirements for establishing, implementing, maintaining and continually improving an information security management system (ISMS), clause 4.2 requires an organization to determine the needs and expectations of interested parties that are relevant to its ISMS1. This includes identifying the legal, regulatory, contractual and other requirements that apply to its information security activities1. Therefore, collecting more evidence on what the service requirements of healthcare monitoring are may not be relevant to verifying the information security incident management process, as it is not directly related to the audit objective or criteria. This option will not be in the audit trail.
NEW QUESTION # 229
You are an experienced ISMS audit team leader guiding an auditor in training. You are testing her understanding of follow-up audits by asking her a series of questions to which the answer is either "true* or
'false'. Which four of the following questions should the answer be true"'
- A. The outcome of a follow-up audit could lower a major nonconformity to minor status
- B. A follow-up audit is required only in instances where a major nonconformity has been identified
- C. The outcome of a follow-up audit could be a recommendabon to suspend the client's certification
- D. The outcomes of a follow-up audit should be reported to the individual managing the audit programme and the audit client
- E. A follow-up audit is required in all instances where nonconformities have been identified
- F. A follow-up audit may be carried out where nonconformities are major
- G. The outcomes of a follow-up audit should be reported to top management and the audit team leader who carried out the audit where the nonconformities were initially identified
- H. A follow-up audit may be carried out where nonconformities are minor
Answer: D,F,G,H
Explanation:
* A follow-up audit may be carried out where nonconformities are major. This is true because a major nonconformity is a situation that raises significant doubt about the ability of the organization's management system to achieve its intended results, and therefore requires immediate corrective action. A follow-up audit is necessary to verify the effectiveness of the corrective action and the conformity of the management system12.
* A follow-up audit may be carried out where nonconformities are minor. This is true because a minor nonconformity is a situation that does not affect the capability of the management system to achieve its intended results, but represents a deviation from the specified requirements. A follow-up audit may be conducted to check the implementation of the corrective action and the improvement of the management system12.
* The outcomes of a follow-up audit should be reported to top management and the audit team leader who carried out the audit where the nonconformities were initially identified. This is true because the top management is responsible for ensuring the effectiveness and continual improvement of the management system, and the audit team leader is accountable for the audit process and the audit conclusions. The follow-up audit report should provide them with objective evidence of the status of the nonconformities and the corrective actions taken by the auditee13.
* The outcomes of a follow-up audit should be reported to the individual managing the audit programme and the audit client. This is true because the individual managing the audit programme is responsible for planning, implementing, monitoring and reviewing the audit activities, and the audit client is the organization or person requesting an audit. The follow-up audit report should inform them of the results of the follow-up audit and any changes in the certification status of the auditee13.
References :=
* ISO 19011:2022 Guidelines for auditing management systems
* ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Information technology - Security techniques - Information security management systems - Requirements
* ISO/IEC 17021-1:2022 Conformity assessment - Requirements for bodies providing audit and certification of management systems - Part 1: Requirements
NEW QUESTION # 230
Scenario 3: NightCore is a multinational technology company based in the United States that focuses on e-commerce, cloud computing, digital streaming, and artificial intelligence. After having an information security management system (ISMS) implemented for over 8 months, they contracted a certification body to conduct a third party audit in order to get certified against ISO/IEC 27001.
The certification body set up a team of seven auditors. Jack, the most experienced auditor, was assigned as the audit team leader. Over the years, he received many well known certifications, such as the ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor, CISA, CISSP, and CISM.
Jack conducted thorough analyses on each phase of the ISMS audit, by studying and evaluating every information security requirement and control that was implemented by NightCore. During stage 2 audit. Jack detected several nonconformities. After comparing the number of purchased invoices for software licenses with the software inventory, Jack found out that the company has been using the illegal versions of a software for many computers. He decided to ask for an explanation from the top management about this nonconformity and see whether they were aware about this. His next step was to audit NightCore's IT Department. The top management assigned Tom, NightCore's system administrator, to act as a guide and accompany Jack and the audit team toward the inner workings of their system and their digital assets infrastructure.
While interviewing a member of the Department of Finance, the auditors discovered that the company had recently made some unusual large transactions to one of their consultants. After gathering all the necessary details regarding the transactions. Jack decided to directly interview the top management.
When discussing about the first nonconformity, the top management told Jack that they willingly decided to use a copied software over the original one since it was cheaper. Jack explained to the top management of NightCore that using illegal versions of software is against the requirements of ISO/IEC 27001 and the national laws and regulations. However, they seemed to be fine with it.
Several months after the audit, Jack sold some of NightCore's information that he collected during the audit for a huge amount of money to competitors of NightCore.
Based on this scenario, answer the following question:
What type of audit evidence has Jack collected when he identified the first nonconformity regarding the software? Refer to scenario 3.
- A. Verbal evidence
- B. Mathematical evidence
- C. Analytical evidence
Answer: B
Explanation:
Jack collected mathematical evidence when he identified nonconformities by comparing the number of purchased invoices for software licenses with the software inventory. This type of evidence involves numerical, quantifiable data that highlights discrepancies and supports findings of compliance or non-compliance.
References: ISO/IEC 27001:2013 Standard, general guidelines on auditing
NEW QUESTION # 231
Which two of the following standards are used as ISMS third-party certification audit criteria?
- A. ISO/IEC 27001
- B. ISO 19011
- C. ISO/IEC 27002
- D. ISO/IEC 17021-1
- E. Relavent legal, statutory, and regulatory requirements
- F. ISO/IEC 20000-1
Answer: A,E
Explanation:
The two standards that are used as ISMS third-party certification audit criteria are ISO/IEC 27001 and relevant legal, statutory, and regulatory requirements. ISO/IEC 27001 specifies the requirements for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and continually improving an information security management system (ISMS)1. Relevant legal, statutory, and regulatory requirements are those that apply to the organization's information security aspects and objectives2. The other options are either not standards (E) or not directly related to the ISMS certification audit criteria (A, B, C, F). References: 1: ISO/IEC 27001:2022, Information technology - Security techniques - Information security management systems - Requirements, Clause 1
\n2: ISO/IEC 27001:2022, Information technology - Security techniques - Information security management systems - Requirements, Clause 4.2
NEW QUESTION # 232
As the ISMS audit team leader, you are conducting a second-party audit of an international logistics company on behalf of an online retailer. During the audit, one of your team members reports a nonconformity relating to control 5.18 (Access rights) of Appendix A of ISO/IEC 27001:2022. She found evidence that removing the server access protocols of 20 people who left in the last 3 months took up to 1 week whereas the policy required removing access within 24 hours of their departure.
Complete the sentence with the best word(s), dick on the blank section you want to complete so that it is highlighted in red, and then click on the applicable text from the options below. Alternatively, you may drag and drop the option to the appropriate blank section.
Answer:
Explanation:
NEW QUESTION # 233
Which of the following is a technical security measure?
- A. User role profiles.
- B. Security policy
- C. Safe storage of backups
- D. Encryption
Answer: D
Explanation:
Explanation
A technical security measure is a measure that uses technology to protect information assets from unauthorized access, modification, disclosure, or destruction. Examples of technical security measures include encryption, firewalls, antivirus software, authentication systems, and access control mechanisms. Encryption is a technical security measure that transforms information into an unreadable format using a secret key or algorithm.
Encryption protects the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of information by preventing unauthorized parties from accessing or altering it. Therefore, encryption is the correct answer to this question. References: ISO/IEC 27000:2022, clause 3.48; ISO/IEC 27002:2022, clause 10.1.
NEW QUESTION # 234
You are an ISMS audit team leader who has been assigned by your certification body to carry out a follow-up audit of a client. You are preparing your audit plan for this audit.
Which two of the following statements are true?
- A. Opportunities for improvement should be verified first, followed by corrections and finally corrective actions
- B. Verification should focus on whether any action undertaken is complete
- C. Corrective actions should be reviewed first, followed by corrections and finally opportunities for improvement
- D. Verification should focus on whether any action undertaken taken has been undertaken efficiently
- E. Corrections should be verified first, followed by corrective actions and finally opportunities for improvement
- F. Verification should focus on whether any action undertaken has been undertaken effectively
Answer: B,F
Explanation:
According to ISO 27001:2022 clause 9.1.2, the organisation shall conduct internal audits at planned intervals to provide information on whether the information security management system conforms to the organisation's own requirements, the requirements of ISO 27001:2022, and is effectively implemented and maintained12 According to ISO 27001:2022 clause 10.1, the organisation shall react to the nonconformities and take action, as applicable, to control and correct them and deal with the consequences. The organisation shall also evaluate the need for action to eliminate the causes of nonconformities, in order to prevent recurrence or occurrence.
The organisation shall implement any action needed, review the effectiveness of any corrective action taken, and make changes to the information security management system, if necessary12 A follow-up audit is a type of internal audit that is conducted after a previous audit to verify whether the nonconformities and corrective actions have been addressed and resolved, and whether the information security management system has been improved12 Therefore, the following statements are true for preparing a follow-up audit plan:
* Verification should focus on whether any action undertaken is complete. This means that the auditor should check whether the organisation has implemented all the planned actions to correct and prevent the nonconformities, and whether the actions have been documented and communicated as required12
* Verification should focus on whether any action undertaken has been undertaken effectively. This means that the auditor should check whether the organisation has achieved the intended results and objectives of the actions, and whether the actions have eliminated or reduced the nonconformities and their causes and consequences12 The following statements are false for preparing a follow-up audit plan:
* Verification should focus on whether any action undertaken has been undertaken efficiently. This is false because efficiency is not a criterion for verifying the actions taken to address the nonconformities and corrective actions. Efficiency refers to the optimal use of resources to achieve the desired outcomes, but it is not a requirement of ISO 27001:2022. The auditor should focus on the effectiveness and completeness of the actions, not on the efficiency12
* Corrections should be verified first, followed by corrective actions and finally opportunities for improvement. This is false because there is no prescribed order for verifying the corrections, corrective actions, and opportunities for improvement. The auditor should verify all the actions taken by the organisation, regardless of their sequence or priority. The auditor may choose to verify the actions based on their relevance, significance, or impact, but this is not a mandatory requirement12
* Opportunities for improvement should be verified first, followed by corrections and finally corrective actions. This is false because there is no prescribed order for verifying the opportunities for
* improvement, corrections, and corrective actions. The auditor should verify all the actions taken by the organisation, regardless of their sequence or priority. The auditor may choose to verify the actions based on their relevance, significance, or impact, but this is not a mandatory requirement12
* Corrective actions should be reviewed first, followed by corrections and finally opportunities for improvement. This is false because there is no prescribed order for reviewing the corrective actions, corrections, and opportunities for improvement. The auditor should review all the actions taken by the organisation, regardless of their sequence or priority. The auditor may choose to review the actions based on their relevance, significance, or impact, but this is not a mandatory requirement12 References:
1: ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Lead Auditor (Information Security Management Systems) Course by CQI and IRCA Certified Training 1 2: ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor Training Course by PECB 2
NEW QUESTION # 235
You are an experienced ISMS audit team leader, assisting an auditor in training to write their first audit report.
You want to check the auditor in training's understanding of terminology relating to the contents of an audit report and chose to do this by presenting the following examples.
For each example, you ask the auditor in training what the correct term is that describes the activity Match the activity to the description.
Answer:
Explanation:
Explanation:
1. An auditor using a copy of ISO/IEC 27001:2022 to check that its requirements are met:
Termed: Reviewing audit criteria.
Justification: The auditor is comparing the auditee's information security management system (ISMS) against the established criteria outlined in the ISO/IEC 27001:2022 standard. This activity falls under the use of audit criteria to determine conformity or nonconformity.
2. An auditor's note that the auditee is not adhering to its clear desk policy:
Termed: Identifying an audit finding.
Justification: The auditor has observed a deviation from the auditee's established policy on clear desks. This observation is documented as a potential nonconformity, which requires further investigation and evaluation.
3. An auditor making a decision regarding the auditee's conformity or otherwise to criteria:
Termed: Determining an audit conclusion.
Justification: Based on the collected audit evidence and evaluation against the established criteria, the auditor forms an opinion about the overall compliance of the auditee's ISMS. This opinion is the audit conclusion and is a key element of the audit report.
4. An auditor examining verifiable records relevant to the audit process:
Termed: Collecting audit evidence.
Justification: The auditor is gathering objective and verifiable information to support their findings and conclusions. This information comes from various sources, including documents, records, interviews, and observations.
NEW QUESTION # 236
What is the name of the system that guarantees the coherence of information security in the organization?
- A. Rootkit
- B. Information Security Management System (ISMS)
- C. Information Technology Service Management (ITSM)
- D. Security regulations for special information for the government
Answer: B
Explanation:
Explanation
The name of the system that guarantees the coherence of information security in the organization is Information Security Management System (ISMS). An ISMS is a systematic approach to managing the confidentiality, integrity and availability of information and information assets. An ISMS includes policies, procedures, processes, roles, responsibilities, resources and performance measures that enable the organization to achieve its information security objectives. An ISMS also includes a risk assessment and treatment process that identifies and addresses the information security risks faced by the organization. ISO/IEC 27001:2022 specifies the requirements for establishing, implementing, maintaining and continually improving an ISMS within the context of the organization (see clause 1). References: CQI & IRCA Certified ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Lead Auditor Training Course, ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Information technology - Security techniques - Information security management systems - Requirements, What is ISMS?
NEW QUESTION # 237
A fire breaks out in a branch office of a health insurance company. The personnel are transferred to neighboring branches to continue their work.
Where in the incident cycle is moving to a stand-by arrangements found?
- A. between damage and recovery
- B. between threat and incident
- C. between incident and damage
- D. between recovery and threat
Answer: C
NEW QUESTION # 238
......
Get up-to-date Real Exam Questions for ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor: https://www.dumpsking.com/ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-testking-dumps.html
Pass ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam Latest Practice Questions: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1-8nXeJIHWf0Q-Ttx_RHne6lHETnHYyxm
